I like to learn and teach. The same enthusiasm a cat exhibits while unraveling a ball of yarn is how I feel about developing new insights and sharing them with others.
However, I’ve noticed my passions for programming, cybersecurity, and really anything to do with hacking,1 are difficult to relay to others effectively, and I think I’ve figured out why. To explain my reasoning, let’s examine one of my other passions first: music.
As a kid, I didn’t really know how to relate to people (I still struggle with that). The way I talked and conducted myself was foreign. I was an outsider, at least until I started playing music. That seemed to draw interest from others. People got curious and started talking to me more often. Using that window of opportunity and what I learned from observing others, I started to make friends.
So why did music make a difference in my case? My hypothesis is that it comes down to a basic quality of music: music engages the senses. While it’s true that a background in music can foster a deeper sense of understanding and appreciation, it’s far from required. Similarly, a good chef is adored by many, even those who don’t know how to cook, because they can taste and enjoy the food.
In comparison, writing software seems disembodied. There isn’t an easily accessible, built-in sensory experience to bridge the gap in knowledge between two or more people as there is with music and cooking.
Also, one has to consider the relationship most people have with technology. Some people regard computers and digital tasks similarly to hammers and nails. That is to say, understanding the nature of the means (how to best use the hammer/computer) often isn’t prioritized as much as achieving the ends (a nail driven into an object/a completed digital task).
It can be difficult to fruitfully share a passion if it’s sufficiently complex, so here are several observations that I hope others may find helpful.
Remember the ‘show’ in show and tell. That is to say, demo when possible so that the listener can see things in action. Presentation can be just as important as content.
Good teachers garner enough interest in the beginning to get students over the initial hurdle of not knowing enough about the subject being taught to want to know more about it. This early stage of eliciting curiosity seems to be critical, like what a spark is to fire. Getting a fire started or put out is harder than keeping something on fire, after all, and curiosity is similar.
It’s easier to be passionate with someone that already shares the same interest than it is to instill passion in someone new to it.
If few people express interest in an endeavor or passion, that doesn’t necessarily mean it lacks in substance. One only needs to look at heliocentricism and the Copernican Revolution to see that even blatant opposition doesn’t lessen the worth of an idea.
A place to write thoughts down can be helpful. Reading one’s own words can be a way of giving oneself someone to listen.
As the document mentions, the term ‘hacker’ is best when bestowed by others. I don’t call myself a hacker for the same reason one wouldn’t walk into a monastery and claim to be an arahant. ↩